PlainIndex

ETF comparison

BOTZ vs PHO

Both Thematic.

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF · Invesco Water Resources ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of BOTZ and PHO would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

BOTZ only 0.0% Shared 0.0% PHO only 0.0%
In BOTZ only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In PHO only
0 positions

Holdings data for BOTZ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for PHO covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

BOTZ

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF

Global X · Thematic

56 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.68%
Net assets
$3.44B
TTM yield
0.62%
Top-10 conc.
—
PHO

Invesco Water Resources ETF

Invesco · Thematic

58 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.59%
Net assets
$2.09B
TTM yield
0.56%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

32
Cost
41
76
Tax efficiency
76
80
Liquidity
70
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
BOTZ sub-score PHO

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

PHO is 9 bps cheaper than BOTZ. On a $100,000 position that's about $90/yr more in fees for BOTZ.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in BOTZ

0 total

Every BOTZ position is also held by PHO.

Only in PHO

0 total

Every PHO position is also held by BOTZ.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.