Skip to main content

ETF comparison

CGMU vs PZA

Both US Municipal Bond.

Capital Group Municipal Income ETF · Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
1.4 %

114 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of CGMU and PZA would leave roughly 1.4% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

CGMU unmatched 99.2% Shared 1.4% PZA unmatched 94.4%

Unmatched is the part of a fund's weight the other fund doesn't match: names only it holds, plus any extra weight it puts in names both funds hold.

In CGMU only
2,221 positions
Shared
114 positions
In PZA only
6,550 positions

Side by side

CGMU

Capital Group Municipal Income ETF

Capital Group · US Municipal Bond

86 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.27%
Net assets
$6.76B
TTM yield
3.47%
Top-10 conc.
5.1%
PZA

Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF

Invesco · US Municipal Bond

83 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.28%
Net assets
$4.02B
TTM yield
4.06%
Top-10 conc.
1.0%

Sub-score comparison

73
Cost
72
93
Tax efficiency
93
93
Liquidity
83
100
Concentration
100
—
Tracking quality
—
CGMU sub-score PZA

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.

Cost difference

CGMU is 1 bps cheaper than PZA. On a $100,000 position that's about $10/yr more in fees for PZA.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with CGMU vs PZA.

Top shared holdings

114 shared in total
# Holding In CGMU In PZA Overlap
1 Chicago Board of Education Dedicated Capital Improvement Tax 0.09% 0.09% 0.09%
2 Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority 0.07% 0.05% 0.05%
3 Mississippi Hospital Equipment & Facilities Authority 0.08% 0.04% 0.04%
4 New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority 0.04% 0.04% 0.04%
5 Utah Transit Authority 0.31% 0.03% 0.03%
6 Illinois Finance Authority 0.14% 0.03% 0.03%
7 Empire State Development Corp 0.07% 0.03% 0.03%
8 State of Illinois 0.17% 0.03% 0.03%
9 New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured Revenue 0.04% 0.03% 0.03%
10 County of Clark NV 0.02% 0.04% 0.02%
11 New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured Revenue 0.02% 0.03% 0.02%
12 Lansing Board of Water & Light 0.02% 0.03% 0.02%

Only in CGMU

2,221 total
  • Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 0.82%
  • Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp Sales Tax Revenue 0.69%
  • Black Belt Energy Gas District 0.53%
  • City of New York NY 0.51%
  • New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority 0.47%
  • California Community Choice Financing Authority 0.45%
  • County of Montgomery MD 0.44%
  • New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority 0.44%
  • Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority 0.40%
  • Black Belt Energy Gas District 0.38%

Only in PZA

6,550 total
  • California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Kaiser Permanente) 0.13%
  • New York (State of) Dormitory Authority 0.12%
  • New York (State of) Dormitory Authority 0.11%
  • Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District 0.10%
  • Texas Water Development Board 0.10%
  • Regents of the University of California Medical Center 0.10%
  • Regents of the University of California Medical Center 0.10%
  • Orange (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Orlando Health Obligated Group) 0.10%
  • Texas Transportation Finance Corp. 0.09%
  • Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority 0.09%

Percentages are holdings overlap with the named fund.

Open CGMU or PZA at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.