PlainIndex

ETF comparison

CIBR vs FDN

Both Thematic.

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF · First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of CIBR and FDN would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

CIBR only 0.0% Shared 0.0% FDN only 0.0%
In CIBR only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In FDN only
0 positions

Holdings data for CIBR covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for FDN covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

CIBR

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF

First Trust · Thematic

67 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.58%
Net assets
$10.19B
TTM yield
0.61%
Top-10 conc.
—
FDN

First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund

First Trust · Thematic

68 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.49%
Net assets
$5.00B
TTM yield
0.00%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

42
Cost
51
76
Tax efficiency
78
100
Liquidity
87
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
CIBR sub-score FDN

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

FDN is 9 bps cheaper than CIBR. On a $100,000 position that's about $90/yr more in fees for CIBR.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in CIBR

0 total

Every CIBR position is also held by FDN.

Only in FDN

0 total

Every FDN position is also held by CIBR.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.