PlainIndex

ETF comparison

CMF vs ITM

Both US Municipal Bond.

iShares California Muni Bond ETF · VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of CMF and ITM would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

CMF only 0.0% Shared 0.0% ITM only 0.0%
In CMF only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In ITM only
0 positions

Holdings data for CMF covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for ITM covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

CMF

iShares California Muni Bond ETF

iShares · US Municipal Bond

90 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.080%
Net assets
$4.26B
TTM yield
2.96%
Top-10 conc.
—
ITM

VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF

VanEck · US Municipal Bond

81 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.18%
Net assets
$2.17B
TTM yield
2.92%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

92
Cost
82
93
Tax efficiency
93
84
Liquidity
71
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
CMF sub-score ITM

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

CMF is 10 bps cheaper than ITM. On a $100,000 position that's about $100/yr more in fees for ITM.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in CMF

0 total

Every CMF position is also held by ITM.

Only in ITM

0 total

Every ITM position is also held by CMF.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.