ETF comparison
COPXvsURNM
Both Materials.
Holdings overlap
0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of COPX and URNM would leave roughly0.0%of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — seewhat we don't scorefor why.
Cost difference
COPX is 10 bps cheaper than URNM. On a $100,000 position that's about $100/yr more in fees for URNM.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open thecost calculator pre-filled with COPX vs URNM.
Top shared holdings
0 shared in totalNo shared holdings between these funds.
Only in COPX
39 total- Lundin Mining Corporation6.06%
- GLENCORE PLC5.99%
- Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.5.97%
- KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA5.81%
- FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC.5.04%
- Hudbay Minerals Inc.4.94%
- BHP GROUP LIMITED4.91%
- ANTOFAGASTA PLC4.86%
- Teck Resources Limited4.85%
- SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION4.84%
Only in URNM
27 total- Cameco Corp17.17%
- Sprott Physical Uranium Trust13.23%
- Nexgen Energy Ltd11.35%
- Energy Fuels Inc/canada4.88%
- Denison Mines Corp4.85%
- Nac Kazatomprom Jsc4.85%
- Deep Yellow Ltd4.38%
- Uranium Energy Corp4.26%
- Paladin Energy Ltd4.16%
- Cgn Mining Co Ltd4.04%
Open COPX or URNM at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodologyand funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.