PlainIndex

ETF comparison

DFAS vs IWN

Both US Small Cap.

Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF · iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of DFAS and IWN would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

DFAS only 0.0% Shared 0.0% IWN only 0.0%
In DFAS only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In IWN only
0 positions

Holdings data for DFAS covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for IWN covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

DFAS

Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF

Dimensional · US Small Cap

85 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.26%
Net assets
$14.04B
TTM yield
0.94%
Top-10 conc.
—
IWN

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF

iShares · US Small Cap

85 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.24%
Net assets
$13.43B
TTM yield
1.49%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

74
Cost
76
87
Tax efficiency
85
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
DFAS sub-score IWN

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IWN is 2 bps cheaper than DFAS. On a $100,000 position that's about $20/yr more in fees for DFAS.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in DFAS

0 total

Every DFAS position is also held by IWN.

Only in IWN

0 total

Every IWN position is also held by DFAS.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.