PlainIndex

ETF comparison

DFLV vs IJR

US Value vs US Small Cap.

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF · iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of DFLV and IJR would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

DFLV only 0.0% Shared 0.0% IJR only 0.0%
In DFLV only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In IJR only
0 positions

Holdings data for DFLV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for IJR covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

DFLV

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

Dimensional · US Value

84 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.21%
Net assets
$5.89B
TTM yield
1.46%
Top-10 conc.
—
IJR

iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF

iShares · US Small Cap

94 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.060%
Net assets
$102.56B
TTM yield
1.16%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

79
Cost
94
85
Tax efficiency
86
90
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
DFLV sub-score IJR

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IJR is 15 bps cheaper than DFLV. On a $100,000 position that's about $150/yr more in fees for DFLV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in DFLV

0 total

Every DFLV position is also held by IJR.

Only in IJR

0 total

Every IJR position is also held by DFLV.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.