PlainIndex

ETF comparison

DFUS vs SCHB

Both US Total Market.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF · Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of DFUS and SCHB would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

DFUS only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SCHB only 0.0%
In DFUS only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SCHB only
0 positions

Holdings data for DFUS covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SCHB covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

DFUS

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF

Dimensional · US Total Market

93 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.090%
Net assets
$19.86B
TTM yield
0.87%
Top-10 conc.
—
SCHB

Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF

Schwab · US Total Market

95 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$40.99B
TTM yield
1.07%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

91
Cost
97
87
Tax efficiency
86
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
DFUS sub-score SCHB

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SCHB is 6 bps cheaper than DFUS. On a $100,000 position that's about $60/yr more in fees for DFUS.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in DFUS

0 total

Every DFUS position is also held by SCHB.

Only in SCHB

0 total

Every SCHB position is also held by DFUS.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.