PlainIndex

ETF comparison

DGRO vs QQQM

Dividend vs US Large Cap Growth.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF · Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of DGRO and QQQM would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

DGRO only 0.0% Shared 0.0% QQQM only 0.0%
In DGRO only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In QQQM only
0 positions

Holdings data for DGRO covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for QQQM covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

iShares · Dividend

90 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.080%
Net assets
$39.65B
TTM yield
2.00%
Top-10 conc.
—
QQQM

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

Invesco · US Large Cap Growth

90 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$82.92B
TTM yield
0.46%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

92
Cost
85
73
Tax efficiency
89
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
DGRO sub-score QQQM

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

DGRO is 7 bps cheaper than QQQM. On a $100,000 position that's about $70/yr more in fees for QQQM.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in DGRO

0 total

Every DGRO position is also held by QQQM.

Only in QQQM

0 total

Every QQQM position is also held by DGRO.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.