Skip to main content

ETF comparison

EEM vs SPEM

Both International Emerging.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
63.1 %

883 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EEM and SPEM would leave roughly 63.1% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

EEM unmatched 36.6% Shared 63.1% SPEM unmatched 37.0%

Unmatched is the part of a fund's weight the other fund doesn't match: names only it holds, plus any extra weight it puts in names both funds hold.

In EEM only
339 positions
Shared
883 positions
In SPEM only
2,032 positions

Side by side

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

iShares · International Emerging

60 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.72%
Net assets
$31.07B
TTM yield
1.80%
Top-10 conc.
38.8%
SPEM

State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

State Street · International Emerging

89 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.070%
Net assets
$17.54B
TTM yield
2.62%
Top-10 conc.
26.3%

Sub-score comparison

28
Cost
93
77
Tax efficiency
75
100
Liquidity
100
59
Concentration
77
—
Tracking quality
—
EEM sub-score SPEM

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.

Cost difference

SPEM is 65 bps cheaper than EEM. On a $100,000 position that's about $650/yr more in fees for EEM.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with EEM vs SPEM.

Top shared holdings

883 shared in total
# Holding In EEM In SPEM Overlap
1 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited 14.26% 14.65% 14.26%
2 Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71% 2.74% 2.71%
3 Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08% 1.79% 1.79%
4 MediaTek Inc. 1.62% 1.82% 1.62%
5 DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17% 1.13% 1.13%
6 HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90% 0.93% 0.90%
7 CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 0.81% 0.81% 0.81%
8 HDFC BANK LIMITED 0.70% 0.83% 0.70%
9 ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. 0.50% 0.82% 0.50%
10 PDD Holdings Inc. 0.47% 0.46% 0.46%
11 INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED 0.43% 0.50% 0.43%
12 AL RAJHI BANKING AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION SJSC 0.41% 0.45% 0.41%

Only in EEM

339 total
  • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 7.76%
  • SK hynix Inc. 6.64%
  • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85%
  • RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 0.66%
  • SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO.,LTD 0.62%
  • SK Square Co., Ltd. 0.60%
  • HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 0.50%
  • United Microelectronics Corporation 0.40%
  • ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 0.38%
  • Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 0.34%

Only in SPEM

2,032 total
  • Reliance Industries Ltd 0.80%
  • ICICI Bank Ltd 0.71%
  • United Microelectronics Corp 0.67%
  • Delta Electronics Thailand PCL 0.40%
  • Vale SA 0.39%
  • Itau Unibanco Holding SA 0.38%
  • Infosys Ltd 0.33%
  • Larsen & Toubro Ltd 0.28%
  • Nanya Technology Corp 0.24%
  • Petroleo Brasileiro SA - Petrobras 0.24%

Percentages are holdings overlap with the named fund.

Open EEM or SPEM at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.