PlainIndex

ETF comparison

EFA vs EWU

Both International Developed.

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF · iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EFA and EWU would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

EFA only 0.0% Shared 0.0% EWU only 0.0%
In EFA only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In EWU only
0 positions

Holdings data for EFA covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for EWU covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

EFA

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

iShares · International Developed

78 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.32%
Net assets
$75.61B
TTM yield
3.17%
Top-10 conc.
—
EWU

iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF

iShares · International Developed

64 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.50%
Net assets
$3.48B
TTM yield
3.47%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

68
Cost
50
71
Tax efficiency
70
100
Liquidity
80
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
EFA sub-score EWU

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

EFA is 18 bps cheaper than EWU. On a $100,000 position that's about $180/yr more in fees for EWU.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in EFA

0 total

Every EFA position is also held by EWU.

Only in EWU

0 total

Every EWU position is also held by EFA.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.