ETF comparison
EFAVvsQQQ
Low Volatility Factor vs US Large Cap Growth.
Holdings overlap
1 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EFAV and QQQ would leave roughly0.2%of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — seewhat we don't scorefor why.
Cost difference
QQQ is 2 bps cheaper than EFAV. On a $100,000 position that's about $20/yr more in fees for EFAV.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open thecost calculator pre-filled with EFAV vs QQQ.
Top shared holdings
1 shared in total| # | Holding | In EFAV | In QQQ | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | COCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS PLC | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.17% |
Only in EFAV
243 total- ENI S.P.A.1.68%
- TOTALENERGIES SE1.67%
- EQUINOR ASA1.59%
- SHELL PLC1.57%
- Iberdrola, S.A.1.51%
- DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD1.47%
- ORANGE SA1.43%
- Swisscom AG1.41%
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited1.40%
- Novartis AG1.36%
Only in QQQ
101 total- NVIDIA Corp.7.60%
- Apple Inc.6.67%
- Micron Technology, Inc.5.64%
- Microsoft Corp.4.35%
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.4.10%
- Amazon.com, Inc.4.02%
- Tesla, Inc.3.30%
- Alphabet Inc.3.27%
- Intel Corp.3.04%
- Alphabet Inc.3.02%
Open EFAV or QQQ at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodologyand funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.