Skip to main content

ETF comparison

EFG vs HEFA

Both International Developed.

iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF · iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EFG and HEFA would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

EFG unmatched 99.7% Shared 0.0% HEFA unmatched 101.2%

Unmatched is the part of a fund's weight the other fund doesn't match: names only it holds, plus any extra weight it puts in names both funds hold.

In EFG only
359 positions
Shared
0 positions
In HEFA only
1 positions

Side by side

EFG

iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF

iShares · International Developed

80 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.34%
Net assets
$15.03B
TTM yield
2.36%
Top-10 conc.
21.1%
HEFA

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF

iShares · International Developed

79 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.35%
Net assets
$7.47B
TTM yield
4.05%
Top-10 conc.
100.0%

Sub-score comparison

66
Cost
65
78
Tax efficiency
75
100
Liquidity
94
84
Concentration
94
—
Tracking quality
—
EFG sub-score HEFA

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.

Cost difference

EFG is 1 bps cheaper than HEFA. On a $100,000 position that's about $10/yr more in fees for HEFA.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with EFG vs HEFA.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in EFG

359 total
  • ASML Holding N.V. 5.92%
  • ASTRAZENECA PLC 2.38%
  • COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 1.94%
  • SAP SE 1.77%
  • SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE 1.71%
  • UBS Group AG 1.56%
  • ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC 1.55%
  • ABB Ltd 1.43%
  • NOVO NORDISK A/S 1.41%
  • Tokyo Electron Limited 1.39%

Only in HEFA

1 total
  • iShares MSCI EAFE ETF 101.20%

Percentages are holdings overlap with the named fund.

Open EFG or HEFA at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.