PlainIndex

ETF comparison

EWG vs FEZ

Both International Developed.

iShares MSCI Germany ETF · State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EWG and FEZ would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

EWG only 0.0% Shared 0.0% FEZ only 0.0%
In EWG only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In FEZ only
0 positions

Holdings data for EWG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for FEZ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

EWG

iShares MSCI Germany ETF

iShares · International Developed

61 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.49%
Net assets
$1.45B
TTM yield
1.61%
Top-10 conc.
—
FEZ

State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF

State Street · International Developed

76 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.29%
Net assets
$4.43B
TTM yield
2.64%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

51
Cost
71
77
Tax efficiency
73
64
Liquidity
85
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
EWG sub-score FEZ

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

FEZ is 20 bps cheaper than EWG. On a $100,000 position that's about $200/yr more in fees for EWG.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in EWG

0 total

Every EWG position is also held by FEZ.

Only in FEZ

0 total

Every FEZ position is also held by EWG.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.