PlainIndex

ETF comparison

EWT vs FXI

Both International Emerging.

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · iShares China Large-Cap ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EWT and FXI would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

EWT only 0.0% Shared 0.0% FXI only 0.0%
In EWT only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In FXI only
0 positions

Holdings data for EWT covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for FXI covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

EWT

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF

iShares · International Emerging

66 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.59%
Net assets
$9.11B
TTM yield
1.12%
Top-10 conc.
—
FXI

iShares China Large-Cap ETF

iShares · International Emerging

56 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.73%
Net assets
$6.07B
TTM yield
2.52%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

41
Cost
27
76
Tax efficiency
71
98
Liquidity
91
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
EWT sub-score FXI

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

EWT is 14 bps cheaper than FXI. On a $100,000 position that's about $140/yr more in fees for FXI.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in EWT

0 total

Every EWT position is also held by FXI.

Only in FXI

0 total

Every FXI position is also held by EWT.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.