PlainIndex

ETF comparison

EWZ vs IEFA

International Emerging vs International Developed.

iShares MSCI Brazil ETF · iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EWZ and IEFA would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

EWZ only 0.0% Shared 0.0% IEFA only 0.0%
In EWZ only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In IEFA only
0 positions

Holdings data for EWZ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for IEFA covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

EWZ

iShares MSCI Brazil ETF

iShares · International Emerging

64 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.59%
Net assets
$11.57B
TTM yield
4.16%
Top-10 conc.
—
IEFA

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF

iShares · International Developed

90 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.070%
Net assets
$180.74B
TTM yield
3.32%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

41
Cost
93
65
Tax efficiency
71
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
EWZ sub-score IEFA

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IEFA is 52 bps cheaper than EWZ. On a $100,000 position that's about $520/yr more in fees for EWZ.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in EWZ

0 total

Every EWZ position is also held by IEFA.

Only in IEFA

0 total

Every IEFA position is also held by EWZ.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.