PlainIndex

ETF comparison

EZU vs VPL

Both International Developed.

iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF · Vanguard FTSE Pacific Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EZU and VPL would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

EZU only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VPL only 0.0%
In EZU only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VPL only
0 positions

Holdings data for EZU covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VPL covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

EZU

iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF

iShares · International Developed

70 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.50%
Net assets
$9.53B
TTM yield
2.74%
Top-10 conc.
VPL

Vanguard FTSE Pacific Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · International Developed

90 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.070%
Net assets
$13.07B
TTM yield
2.99%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

50
Cost
93
73
Tax efficiency
72
99
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
EZU sub-score VPL

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

VPL is 43 bps cheaper than EZU. On a $100,000 position that's about $430/yr more in fees for EZU.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in EZU

0 total

Every EZU position is also held by VPL.

Only in VPL

0 total

Every VPL position is also held by EZU.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.