PlainIndex

ETF comparison

FBND vs IUSB

Both US Aggregate Bond.

Fidelity Total Bond ETF · iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of FBND and IUSB would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

FBND only 0.0% Shared 0.0% IUSB only 0.0%
In FBND only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In IUSB only
0 positions

Holdings data for FBND covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for IUSB covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

FBND

Fidelity Total Bond ETF

Fidelity · US Aggregate Bond

70 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.36%
Net assets
$25.56B
TTM yield
4.70%
Top-10 conc.
—
IUSB

iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF

iShares · US Aggregate Bond

84 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.060%
Net assets
$36.54B
TTM yield
4.24%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

64
Cost
94
43
Tax efficiency
45
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
FBND sub-score IUSB

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IUSB is 30 bps cheaper than FBND. On a $100,000 position that's about $300/yr more in fees for FBND.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in FBND

0 total

Every FBND position is also held by IUSB.

Only in IUSB

0 total

Every IUSB position is also held by FBND.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.