PlainIndex

ETF comparison

FSTA vs XLP

Both Consumer Staples.

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF · State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of FSTA and XLP would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

FSTA only 0.0% Shared 0.0% XLP only 0.0%
In FSTA only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In XLP only
0 positions

Holdings data for FSTA covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for XLP covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

FSTA

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF

Fidelity · Consumer Staples

80 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.084%
Net assets
$1.44B
TTM yield
2.15%
Top-10 conc.
XLP

State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF

State Street · Consumer Staples

91 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.080%
Net assets
$14.55B
TTM yield
2.58%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

92
Cost
92
77
Tax efficiency
76
63
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
FSTA sub-score XLP

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.084% vs 0.080%).

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in FSTA

0 total

Every FSTA position is also held by XLP.

Only in XLP

0 total

Every XLP position is also held by FSTA.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.