ETF comparison
GPIQvsQQQI
Both Covered-Call Income.
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premiu · NEOS NASDAQ-100(R) High Income ETF
Holdings overlap
102 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of GPIQ and QQQI would leave roughly95.2%of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — seewhat we don't scorefor why.
Cost difference
GPIQ is 39 bps cheaper than QQQI. On a $100,000 position that's about $390/yr more in fees for QQQI.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open thecost calculator pre-filled with GPIQ vs QQQI.
Top shared holdings
102 shared in total| # | Holding | In GPIQ | In QQQI | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVIDIA CORP | 7.47% | 7.65% | 7.47% |
| 2 | APPLE INC | 6.59% | 6.63% | 6.59% |
| 3 | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 5.62% | 5.61% | 5.61% |
| 4 | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 4.10% | 4.12% | 4.10% |
| 5 | AMAZON.COM INC | 4.20% | 4.05% | 4.05% |
| 6 | MICROSOFT CORP | 3.95% | 4.38% | 3.95% |
| 7 | ALPHABET INC | 3.54% | 3.32% | 3.32% |
| 8 | TESLA INC | 3.17% | 3.35% | 3.17% |
| 9 | INTEL CORP | 3.01% | 2.99% | 2.99% |
| 10 | BROADCOM INC | 2.68% | 2.81% | 2.68% |
| 11 | META PLATFORMS INC | 2.77% | 2.64% | 2.64% |
| 12 | ALPHABET INC | 2.56% | 3.06% | 2.56% |
Only in GPIQ
1 total- GOLDMAN SACHS TRUST0.10%
Only in QQQI
1 total- First American Treasury Obliga0.40%
Open GPIQ or QQQI at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodologyand funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.