PlainIndex

ETF comparison

ICVT vs TIP

US Corporate Bond vs TIPS.

iShares Convertible Bond ETF · iShares TIPS Bond ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of ICVT and TIP would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

ICVT only 0.0% Shared 0.0% TIP only 0.0%
In ICVT only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In TIP only
0 positions

Holdings data for ICVT covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for TIP covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

ICVT

iShares Convertible Bond ETF

iShares · US Corporate Bond

77 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.20%
Net assets
$6.08B
TTM yield
1.46%
Top-10 conc.
—
TIP

iShares TIPS Bond ETF

iShares · TIPS

79 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.18%
Net assets
$14.75B
TTM yield
2.77%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

80
Cost
82
55
Tax efficiency
48
91
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
ICVT sub-score TIP

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

TIP is 2 bps cheaper than ICVT. On a $100,000 position that's about $20/yr more in fees for ICVT.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in ICVT

0 total

Every ICVT position is also held by TIP.

Only in TIP

0 total

Every TIP position is also held by ICVT.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.