PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IFRA vs JETS

Both Industrials.

iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF · U.S. Global Jets ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IFRA and JETS would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IFRA only 0.0% Shared 0.0% JETS only 0.0%
In IFRA only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In JETS only
0 positions

Holdings data for IFRA covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for JETS covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IFRA

iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF

iShares · Industrials

76 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.30%
Net assets
$4.14B
TTM yield
1.56%
Top-10 conc.
—
JETS

U.S. Global Jets ETF

U.S. Global · Industrials

53 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.60%
Net assets
$738.2M
TTM yield
0.92%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

70
Cost
40
80
Tax efficiency
82
83
Liquidity
51
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IFRA sub-score JETS

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IFRA is 30 bps cheaper than JETS. On a $100,000 position that's about $300/yr more in fees for JETS.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IFRA

0 total

Every IFRA position is also held by JETS.

Only in JETS

0 total

Every JETS position is also held by IFRA.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.