PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IGM vs IXN

Both Technology.

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF · iShares Global Tech ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IGM and IXN would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IGM only 0.0% Shared 0.0% IXN only 0.0%
In IGM only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In IXN only
0 positions

Holdings data for IGM covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for IXN covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IGM

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF

iShares · Technology

78 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.39%
Net assets
$9.54B
TTM yield
0.15%
Top-10 conc.
—
IXN

iShares Global Tech ETF

iShares · Technology

77 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.39%
Net assets
$7.81B
TTM yield
0.28%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

61
Cost
61
85
Tax efficiency
84
99
Liquidity
95
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IGM sub-score IXN

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.39% vs 0.39%).

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IGM

0 total

Every IGM position is also held by IXN.

Only in IXN

0 total

Every IXN position is also held by IGM.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.