ETF comparison

IJHvsSPMD

Both US Mid Cap.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
99.8%

400 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IJH and SPMD would leave roughly99.8%of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IJH only 0.0%Shared 99.8%SPMD only 0.0%
In IJH only
0 positions
Shared
400 positions
In SPMD only
1 positions

Side by side

IJH

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

iShares · US Mid Cap

95composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.050%
Net assets
$124.94B
TTM yield
1.20%
Top-10 conc.
10.9%
SPMD

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF

State Street · US Mid Cap

96composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$18.60B
TTM yield
1.25%
Top-10 conc.
9.8%

Sub-score comparison

95
Cost
97
88
Tax efficiency
88
100
Liquidity
100
99
Concentration
100
Tracking quality
IJHsub-scoreSPMD

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — seewhat we don't scorefor why.

Cost difference

SPMD is 2 bps cheaper than IJH. On a $100,000 position that's about $20/yr more in fees for IJH.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open thecost calculator pre-filled with IJH vs SPMD.

Top shared holdings

400 shared in total
#HoldingIn IJHIn SPMDOverlap
1TWILIO INC0.86%0.86%0.86%
2CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP0.84%0.84%0.84%
3MKS INC0.83%0.83%0.83%
4CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP0.77%0.77%0.77%
5NVENT ELECTRIC PLC0.75%0.76%0.75%
6ENTEGRIS INC0.75%0.76%0.75%
7ATI INC0.74%0.74%0.74%
8ILLUMINA INC0.73%0.73%0.73%
9TECHNIPFMC PLC0.73%0.73%0.73%
10STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC0.71%0.71%0.71%
11MASTEC INC0.71%0.71%0.71%
12WOODWARD INC0.70%0.70%0.70%

Only in IJH

0 total

Every IJH position is also held by SPMD.

Only in SPMD

1 total
  • State Street Global Advisors0.00%

Open IJH or SPMD at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodologyand funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see/methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.