ETF comparison
INTFvsOMFL
Both Multi-Factor.
iShares International Equity Factor ETF · Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Holdings overlap
1 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of INTF and OMFL would leave roughly0.0%of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — seewhat we don't scorefor why.
Cost difference
INTF is 13 bps cheaper than OMFL. On a $100,000 position that's about $130/yr more in fees for OMFL.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open thecost calculator pre-filled with INTF vs OMFL.
Top shared holdings
1 shared in total| # | Holding | In INTF | In OMFL | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qiagen N.V. | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Only in INTF
477 total- ASML Holding N.V.2.12%
- Novartis AG2.06%
- ABB Ltd1.10%
- ROYAL BANK OF CANADA1.07%
- Roche Holding AG1.02%
- HSBC HOLDINGS PLC1.00%
- Nestle S.A.0.99%
- ASTRAZENECA PLC0.94%
- BHP GROUP LIMITED0.90%
- Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.0.86%
Only in OMFL
477 total- Apple Inc.8.57%
- NVIDIA Corp.5.05%
- Alphabet Inc.4.38%
- Alphabet Inc.3.53%
- Microsoft Corp.3.14%
- QUALCOMM Inc.2.75%
- Visa Inc.2.59%
- Micron Technology, Inc.2.37%
- Lam Research Corp.2.17%
- Chevron Corp.1.91%
Open INTF or OMFL at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodologyand funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.