ETF comparison

INTF vs OMFL

Both Multi-Factor.

iShares International Equity Factor ETF · Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
0.0 %

1 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of INTF and OMFL would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

INTF only 99.1% Shared 0.0% OMFL only 100.1%
In INTF only
477 positions
Shared
1 positions
In OMFL only
928 positions

Side by side

INTF

iShares International Equity Factor ETF

iShares · Multi-Factor

85 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.16%
Net assets
$3.47B
TTM yield
2.99%
Top-10 conc.
12.1%
OMFL

Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Invesco · Multi-Factor

78 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.29%
Net assets
$4.72B
TTM yield
0.81%
Top-10 conc.
29.6%

Sub-score comparison

84
Cost
71
82
Tax efficiency
86
80
Liquidity
86
97
Concentration
72
Tracking quality
INTF sub-score OMFL

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.

Cost difference

INTF is 13 bps cheaper than OMFL. On a $100,000 position that's about $130/yr more in fees for OMFL.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with INTF vs OMFL.

Top shared holdings

1 shared in total
# Holding In INTF In OMFL Overlap
1 Qiagen N.V. 0.06% 0.01% 0.01%

Only in INTF

477 total
  • ASML Holding N.V. 2.12%
  • Novartis AG 2.06%
  • ABB Ltd 1.10%
  • ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 1.07%
  • Roche Holding AG 1.02%
  • HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.00%
  • Nestle S.A. 0.99%
  • ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.94%
  • BHP GROUP LIMITED 0.90%
  • Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. 0.86%

Only in OMFL

928 total
  • NVIDIA Corp. 5.69%
  • Apple Inc. 4.15%
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. 3.32%
  • Microsoft Corp. 2.91%
  • Amazon.com, Inc. 2.51%
  • Micron Technology, Inc. 2.38%
  • Alphabet Inc. 1.76%
  • Alphabet Inc. 1.43%
  • Applied Materials, Inc. 1.04%
  • Tesla, Inc. 1.03%

Open INTF or OMFL at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.