ETF comparison
INTF vs OMFL
Both Multi-Factor.
iShares International Equity Factor ETF · Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Holdings overlap
1 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of INTF and OMFL would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.
Cost difference
INTF is 13 bps cheaper than OMFL. On a $100,000 position that's about $130/yr more in fees for OMFL.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with INTF vs OMFL.
Top shared holdings
1 shared in total| # | Holding | In INTF | In OMFL | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qiagen N.V. | 0.06% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Only in INTF
477 total- ASML Holding N.V. 2.12%
- Novartis AG 2.06%
- ABB Ltd 1.10%
- ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 1.07%
- Roche Holding AG 1.02%
- HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.00%
- Nestle S.A. 0.99%
- ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.94%
- BHP GROUP LIMITED 0.90%
- Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. 0.86%
Only in OMFL
928 total- NVIDIA Corp. 5.69%
- Apple Inc. 4.15%
- Meta Platforms, Inc. 3.32%
- Microsoft Corp. 2.91%
- Amazon.com, Inc. 2.51%
- Micron Technology, Inc. 2.38%
- Alphabet Inc. 1.76%
- Alphabet Inc. 1.43%
- Applied Materials, Inc. 1.04%
- Tesla, Inc. 1.03%
Open INTF or OMFL at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions
matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see
/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.