PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IPAC vs IXUS

International Developed vs International Total.

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF · iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IPAC and IXUS would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IPAC only 0.0% Shared 0.0% IXUS only 0.0%
In IPAC only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In IXUS only
0 positions

Holdings data for IPAC covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for IXUS covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IPAC

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF

iShares · International Developed

81 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.090%
Net assets
$2.50B
TTM yield
3.92%
Top-10 conc.
—
IXUS

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF

iShares · International Total

90 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.070%
Net assets
$56.23B
TTM yield
2.94%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

91
Cost
93
68
Tax efficiency
72
74
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IPAC sub-score IXUS

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IXUS is 2 bps cheaper than IPAC. On a $100,000 position that's about $20/yr more in fees for IPAC.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IPAC

0 total

Every IPAC position is also held by IXUS.

Only in IXUS

0 total

Every IXUS position is also held by IPAC.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.