PlainIndex

ETF comparison

ITA vs IYJ

Both Industrials.

iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF · iShares U.S. Industrials ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of ITA and IYJ would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

ITA only 0.0% Shared 0.0% IYJ only 0.0%
In ITA only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In IYJ only
0 positions

Holdings data for ITA covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for IYJ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

ITA

iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF

iShares · Industrials

78 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.38%
Net assets
$13.56B
TTM yield
0.49%
Top-10 conc.
—
IYJ

iShares U.S. Industrials ETF

iShares · Industrials

69 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.38%
Net assets
$1.99B
TTM yield
0.77%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

62
Cost
62
84
Tax efficiency
83
100
Liquidity
70
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
ITA sub-score IYJ

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.38% vs 0.38%).

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in ITA

0 total

Every ITA position is also held by IYJ.

Only in IYJ

0 total

Every IYJ position is also held by ITA.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.