ETF comparison

IVWvsSPYG

Both US Large Cap Growth.

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
99.9%

147 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IVW and SPYG would leave roughly99.9%of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IVW only 0.0%Shared 99.9%SPYG only 0.0%
In IVW only
0 positions
Shared
147 positions
In SPYG only
1 positions

Side by side

IVW

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF

iShares · US Large Cap Growth

81composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.18%
Net assets
$76.57B
TTM yield
0.36%
Top-10 conc.
56.4%
SPYG

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

State Street · US Large Cap Growth

86composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.040%
Net assets
$54.46B
TTM yield
0.48%
Top-10 conc.
56.4%

Sub-score comparison

82
Cost
96
90
Tax efficiency
90
100
Liquidity
100
34
Concentration
34
Tracking quality
IVWsub-scoreSPYG

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — seewhat we don't scorefor why.

Cost difference

SPYG is 14 bps cheaper than IVW. On a $100,000 position that's about $140/yr more in fees for IVW.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open thecost calculator pre-filled with IVW vs SPYG.

Top shared holdings

147 shared in total
#HoldingIn IVWIn SPYGOverlap
1NVIDIA CORP13.65%13.65%13.65%
2MICROSOFT CORP7.80%7.80%7.80%
3APPLE INC5.98%5.99%5.98%
4ALPHABET INC5.90%5.90%5.90%
5BROADCOM INC5.04%5.04%5.04%
6ALPHABET INC4.70%4.70%4.70%
7MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC3.67%3.67%3.67%
8META PLATFORMS INC3.48%3.48%3.48%
9AMAZON.COM INC3.48%3.48%3.48%
10ELI LILLY & COMPANY2.67%2.67%2.67%
11ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.67%2.67%2.67%
12BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC2.58%2.58%2.58%

Only in IVW

0 total

Every IVW position is also held by SPYG.

Only in SPYG

1 total
  • State Street Global Advisors0.00%

Open IVW or SPYG at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodologyand funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see/methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.