PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IWD vs RPG

US Value vs US Large Cap Growth.

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IWD and RPG would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IWD only 0.0% Shared 0.0% RPG only 0.0%
In IWD only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In RPG only
0 positions

Holdings data for IWD covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for RPG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IWD

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

iShares · US Value

88 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.18%
Net assets
$74.26B
TTM yield
1.55%
Top-10 conc.
—
RPG

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF

Invesco · US Large Cap Growth

72 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.35%
Net assets
$1.84B
TTM yield
0.19%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

82
Cost
65
85
Tax efficiency
90
100
Liquidity
68
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IWD sub-score RPG

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IWD is 17 bps cheaper than RPG. On a $100,000 position that's about $170/yr more in fees for RPG.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IWD

0 total

Every IWD position is also held by RPG.

Only in RPG

0 total

Every RPG position is also held by IWD.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.