PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IWO vs VIG

US Small Cap vs Dividend.

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF · Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IWO and VIG would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IWO only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VIG only 0.0%
In IWO only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VIG only
0 positions

Holdings data for IWO covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VIG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IWO

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF

iShares · US Small Cap

86 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.24%
Net assets
$13.93B
TTM yield
0.42%
Top-10 conc.
VIG

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · Dividend

92 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.040%
Net assets
$124.65B
TTM yield
1.51%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

76
Cost
96
89
Tax efficiency
75
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
IWO sub-score VIG

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

VIG is 20 bps cheaper than IWO. On a $100,000 position that's about $200/yr more in fees for IWO.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IWO

0 total

Every IWO position is also held by VIG.

Only in VIG

0 total

Every VIG position is also held by IWO.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.