PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IXG vs KRE

Both Financials.

iShares Global Financials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IXG and KRE would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IXG only 0.0% Shared 0.0% KRE only 0.0%
In IXG only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In KRE only
0 positions

Holdings data for IXG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for KRE covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IXG

iShares Global Financials ETF

iShares · Financials

59 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.41%
Net assets
$541.2M
TTM yield
2.03%
Top-10 conc.
—
KRE

State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF

State Street · Financials

73 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.35%
Net assets
$4.17B
TTM yield
2.25%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

59
Cost
65
78
Tax efficiency
77
45
Liquidity
83
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IXG sub-score KRE

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

KRE is 6 bps cheaper than IXG. On a $100,000 position that's about $60/yr more in fees for IXG.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IXG

0 total

Every IXG position is also held by KRE.

Only in KRE

0 total

Every KRE position is also held by IXG.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.