PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IYW vs XLK

Both Technology.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF · State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IYW and XLK would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IYW only 0.0% Shared 0.0% XLK only 0.0%
In IYW only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In XLK only
0 positions

Holdings data for IYW covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for XLK covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IYW

iShares U.S. Technology ETF

iShares · Technology

79 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.38%
Net assets
$21.45B
TTM yield
0.12%
Top-10 conc.
—
XLK

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

State Street · Technology

92 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.080%
Net assets
$103.33B
TTM yield
0.48%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

62
Cost
92
85
Tax efficiency
84
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IYW sub-score XLK

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

XLK is 30 bps cheaper than IYW. On a $100,000 position that's about $300/yr more in fees for IYW.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IYW

0 total

Every IYW position is also held by XLK.

Only in XLK

0 total

Every XLK position is also held by IYW.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.