PlainIndex

ETF comparison

LIT vs TAN

Both Thematic.

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF · Invesco Solar ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of LIT and TAN would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

LIT only 0.0% Shared 0.0% TAN only 0.0%
In LIT only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In TAN only
0 positions

Holdings data for LIT covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for TAN covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Global X · Thematic

51 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.75%
Net assets
$2.13B
TTM yield
0.36%
Top-10 conc.
—
TAN

Invesco Solar ETF

Invesco · Thematic

52 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.70%
Net assets
$1.62B
TTM yield
0.00%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

25
Cost
30
77
Tax efficiency
78
71
Liquidity
66
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
LIT sub-score TAN

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

TAN is 5 bps cheaper than LIT. On a $100,000 position that's about $50/yr more in fees for LIT.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in LIT

0 total

Every LIT position is also held by TAN.

Only in TAN

0 total

Every TAN position is also held by LIT.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.