PlainIndex

ETF comparison

MCHI vs PXH

Both International Emerging.

iShares MSCI China ETF · Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of MCHI and PXH would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

MCHI only 0.0% Shared 0.0% PXH only 0.0%
In MCHI only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In PXH only
0 positions

Holdings data for MCHI covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for PXH covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

MCHI

iShares MSCI China ETF

iShares · International Emerging

64 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.59%
Net assets
$6.75B
TTM yield
2.21%
Top-10 conc.
—
PXH

Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF

Invesco · International Emerging

61 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.47%
Net assets
$1.95B
TTM yield
3.56%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

41
Cost
53
72
Tax efficiency
67
93
Liquidity
69
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
MCHI sub-score PXH

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

PXH is 12 bps cheaper than MCHI. On a $100,000 position that's about $120/yr more in fees for MCHI.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in MCHI

0 total

Every MCHI position is also held by PXH.

Only in PXH

0 total

Every PXH position is also held by MCHI.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.