PlainIndex

ETF comparison

RPG vs SCHD

US Large Cap Growth vs Dividend.

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of RPG and SCHD would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

RPG only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SCHD only 0.0%
In RPG only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SCHD only
0 positions

Holdings data for RPG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SCHD covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

RPG

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF

Invesco · US Large Cap Growth

72 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.35%
Net assets
$1.84B
TTM yield
0.19%
Top-10 conc.
—
SCHD

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

Schwab · Dividend

90 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.060%
Net assets
$91.12B
TTM yield
3.29%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

65
Cost
94
90
Tax efficiency
68
68
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
RPG sub-score SCHD

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SCHD is 29 bps cheaper than RPG. On a $100,000 position that's about $290/yr more in fees for RPG.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in RPG

0 total

Every RPG position is also held by SCHD.

Only in SCHD

0 total

Every SCHD position is also held by RPG.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.