PlainIndex

ETF comparison

RPV vs VO

US Value vs US Mid Cap.

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF · Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of RPV and VO would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

RPV only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VO only 0.0%
In RPV only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VO only
0 positions

Holdings data for RPV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VO covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

RPV

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

Invesco · US Value

70 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.35%
Net assets
$1.81B
TTM yield
2.33%
Top-10 conc.
—
VO

Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · US Mid Cap

95 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$213.76B
TTM yield
1.40%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

65
Cost
97
82
Tax efficiency
85
68
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
RPV sub-score VO

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

VO is 32 bps cheaper than RPV. On a $100,000 position that's about $320/yr more in fees for RPV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in RPV

0 total

Every RPV position is also held by VO.

Only in VO

0 total

Every VO position is also held by RPV.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.