PlainIndex

ETF comparison

SPHB vs VB

Value Factor vs US Small Cap.

Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF · Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of SPHB and VB would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

SPHB only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VB only 0.0%
In SPHB only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VB only
0 positions

Holdings data for SPHB covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VB covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

SPHB

Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF

Invesco · Value Factor

71 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets
$831.3M
TTM yield
0.59%
Top-10 conc.
—
VB

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · US Small Cap

95 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$177.42B
TTM yield
1.23%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

75
Cost
97
86
Tax efficiency
86
53
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
SPHB sub-score VB

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

VB is 22 bps cheaper than SPHB. On a $100,000 position that's about $220/yr more in fees for SPHB.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in SPHB

0 total

Every SPHB position is also held by VB.

Only in VB

0 total

Every VB position is also held by SPHB.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.