Lazy portfolio
Golden Butterfly Portfolio
Tyler Larimer, Portfolio Charts (~2016)
A balanced-tilt extension of the Permanent Portfolio: 40% stocks (half total-market, half small-cap value), 40% Treasuries (half long-duration, half short-duration), 20% gold. Aims for similar drawdown protection while capturing more equity-side return.
Allocation
- 20% · US Total Market
- 20% · Small-cap value (tilt)
- 20% · Long-term Treasuries
- 20% · Short-term Treasuries
- 20% · Gold
Weighted expense ratio
0.15%
Across the 5 of 5 slices we could price.
Weighted tax efficiency
65
/100, weighted by allocation. Lower in heavy-bond portfolios.
Slices
5
Number of holdings — also the number of lots you rebalance.
Implementation
| Weight | Role | Ticker | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20% | US Total Market | VTI | 95 |
| 20% | Small-cap value (tilt) | VYM | 92 |
| 20% | Long-term Treasuries | TLT | 81 |
| 20% | Short-term Treasuries | SHY | 82 |
| 20% | Gold | GLD | 73 |
- VYM · A pure small-cap-value fund (e.g. AVUV) isn't in the catalog yet — VYM is a value-tilt large-cap substitute. The factor tilt is partially captured.
Editorial take
A reasonable middle ground for investors who like the Permanent's logic but find pure equal-weight too conservative. The small-cap value tilt is doing real work here — replacing it with another total-market fund collapses the strategy back into something closer to a 40/40/20.
Compare the slices
See holdings overlap and cost difference between any two of this portfolio's funds.
Curated allocation. The funds listed are how this portfolio would be built using the catalog as it stands today; alternate tickers and notes are flagged inline.
PlainIndex publishes data and editorial commentary — nothing here is personalized investment advice. Read the methodology for how the scores referenced here are computed.