Lazy portfolio
Permanent Portfolio
Harry Browne, "Fail-Safe Investing" (1999)
Equal weights to four assets selected to cover the four macroeconomic regimes Browne identified: prosperity (stocks), recession (cash), inflation (gold), and deflation (long-term bonds). Designed to never lose more than a small amount in any 12-month window, not to maximize return.
Allocation
- 25% · US Stocks (prosperity)
- 25% · Long-term Treasuries (deflation)
- 25% · Cash equivalent (recession)
- 25% · Gold (inflation)
Weighted expense ratio
0.18%
Across the 4 of 4 slices we could price.
Weighted tax efficiency
63
/100, weighted by allocation. Lower in heavy-bond portfolios.
Slices
4
Number of holdings — also the number of lots you rebalance.
Implementation
| Weight | Role | Ticker | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25% | US Stocks (prosperity) | VTI | 95 |
| 25% | Long-term Treasuries (deflation) | TLT | 81 |
| 25% | Cash equivalent (recession) | SHY | 82 |
| 25% | Gold (inflation) | GLD | 73 |
- SHY · 1–3 year Treasuries stand in for cash; modest yield without meaningful duration risk.
Editorial take
The Permanent Portfolio drags relative to a 60/40 in most environments, and that's by design — you're paying expected return for downside protection. Worth considering for capital-preservation-focused holdings (think bridge years before retirement). Less appropriate as a primary accumulation-phase portfolio.
Compare the slices
See holdings overlap and cost difference between any two of this portfolio's funds.
Curated allocation. The funds listed are how this portfolio would be built using the catalog as it stands today; alternate tickers and notes are flagged inline.
PlainIndex publishes data and editorial commentary — nothing here is personalized investment advice. Read the methodology for how the scores referenced here are computed.