PlainIndex

ETF comparison

AIQ vs BOTZ

Both Thematic.

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF · Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of AIQ and BOTZ would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

AIQ only 0.0% Shared 0.0% BOTZ only 0.0%
In AIQ only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In BOTZ only
0 positions

Holdings data for AIQ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for BOTZ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

AIQ

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF

Global X · Thematic

62 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.68%
Net assets
$8.61B
TTM yield
0.17%
Top-10 conc.
—
BOTZ

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF

Global X · Thematic

56 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.68%
Net assets
$3.44B
TTM yield
0.62%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

32
Cost
32
77
Tax efficiency
76
97
Liquidity
80
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
AIQ sub-score BOTZ

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.68% vs 0.68%).

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in AIQ

0 total

Every AIQ position is also held by BOTZ.

Only in BOTZ

0 total

Every BOTZ position is also held by AIQ.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.