PlainIndex

ETF comparison

AIRR vs JETS

Both Industrials.

First Trust RBA American Industrial RenaissanceTM ETF · U.S. Global Jets ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of AIRR and JETS would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

AIRR only 0.0% Shared 0.0% JETS only 0.0%
In AIRR only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In JETS only
0 positions

Holdings data for AIRR covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for JETS covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

AIRR

First Trust RBA American Industrial RenaissanceTM ETF

First Trust · Industrials

64 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.69%
Net assets
$10.14B
TTM yield
0.14%
Top-10 conc.
—
JETS

U.S. Global Jets ETF

U.S. Global · Industrials

53 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.60%
Net assets
$738.2M
TTM yield
0.92%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

31
Cost
40
85
Tax efficiency
82
100
Liquidity
51
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
AIRR sub-score JETS

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

JETS is 9 bps cheaper than AIRR. On a $100,000 position that's about $90/yr more in fees for AIRR.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in AIRR

0 total

Every AIRR position is also held by JETS.

Only in JETS

0 total

Every JETS position is also held by AIRR.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.