PlainIndex

ETF comparison

BBAX vs EFV

Both International Developed.

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF · iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of BBAX and EFV would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

BBAX only 0.0% Shared 0.0% EFV only 0.0%
In BBAX only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In EFV only
0 positions

Holdings data for BBAX covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for EFV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

BBAX

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF

JPMorgan · International Developed

81 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.19%
Net assets
$6.39B
TTM yield
3.57%
Top-10 conc.
—
EFV

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF

iShares · International Developed

78 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.31%
Net assets
$29.97B
TTM yield
3.83%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

81
Cost
69
70
Tax efficiency
69
92
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
BBAX sub-score EFV

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

BBAX is 12 bps cheaper than EFV. On a $100,000 position that's about $120/yr more in fees for EFV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in BBAX

0 total

Every BBAX position is also held by EFV.

Only in EFV

0 total

Every EFV position is also held by BBAX.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.