PlainIndex

ETF comparison

CIBR vs LIT

Both Thematic.

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF · Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of CIBR and LIT would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

CIBR only 0.0% Shared 0.0% LIT only 0.0%
In CIBR only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In LIT only
0 positions

Holdings data for CIBR covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for LIT covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

CIBR

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF

First Trust · Thematic

67 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.58%
Net assets
$10.19B
TTM yield
0.61%
Top-10 conc.
—
LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Global X · Thematic

51 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.75%
Net assets
$2.13B
TTM yield
0.36%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

42
Cost
25
76
Tax efficiency
77
100
Liquidity
71
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
CIBR sub-score LIT

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

CIBR is 17 bps cheaper than LIT. On a $100,000 position that's about $170/yr more in fees for LIT.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in CIBR

0 total

Every CIBR position is also held by LIT.

Only in LIT

0 total

Every LIT position is also held by CIBR.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.