Skip to main content

ETF comparison

LIT vs MOO

Both Thematic.

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF · VanEck Agribusiness ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of LIT and MOO would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

LIT unmatched 100.0% Shared 0.0% MOO unmatched 100.0%

Unmatched is the part of a fund's weight the other fund doesn't match: names only it holds, plus any extra weight it puts in names both funds hold.

In LIT only
41 positions
Shared
0 positions
In MOO only
46 positions

Side by side

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Global X · Thematic

44 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.75%
Net assets
$1.43B
TTM yield
0.83%
Top-10 conc.
66.1%
MOO

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

VanEck · Thematic

51 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.56%
Net assets
$1.14B
TTM yield
2.20%
Top-10 conc.
60.2%

Sub-score comparison

25
Cost
44
76
Tax efficiency
74
63
Liquidity
59
20
Concentration
28
—
Tracking quality
—
LIT sub-score MOO

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.

Cost difference

MOO is 19 bps cheaper than LIT. On a $100,000 position that's about $190/yr more in fees for LIT.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with LIT vs MOO.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in LIT

41 total
  • RIO TINTO PLC 22.89%
  • NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. 6.89%
  • Panasonic Holdings Corporation 6.74%
  • TDK CORPORATION 5.58%
  • ALBEMARLE CORPORATION 4.53%
  • Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. 4.14%
  • SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. 4.04%
  • BYD COMPANY LIMITED 3.91%
  • TESLA, INC. 3.77%
  • LG ENERGY SOLUTION, LTD. 3.56%

Only in MOO

46 total
  • Bayer AG 9.26%
  • Corteva Inc 8.90%
  • Deere & Co 8.86%
  • Nutrien Ltd 6.15%
  • Zoetis Inc 5.19%
  • Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 5.05%
  • Kubota Corp 4.70%
  • CF Industries Holdings Inc 4.36%
  • Tyson Foods Inc 4.34%
  • Bunge Global SA 3.36%

Percentages are holdings overlap with the named fund.

Open LIT or MOO at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.