PlainIndex

ETF comparison

MOO vs SKYY

Both Thematic.

VanEck Agribusiness ETF · First Trust Cloud Computing ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of MOO and SKYY would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

MOO only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SKYY only 0.0%
In MOO only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SKYY only
0 positions

Holdings data for MOO covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SKYY covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

MOO

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

VanEck · Thematic

55 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.56%
Net assets
$1.16B
TTM yield
2.15%
Top-10 conc.
—
SKYY

First Trust Cloud Computing ETF

First Trust · Thematic

59 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.60%
Net assets
$2.44B
TTM yield
0.00%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

44
Cost
40
70
Tax efficiency
78
59
Liquidity
73
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
MOO sub-score SKYY

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

MOO is 4 bps cheaper than SKYY. On a $100,000 position that's about $40/yr more in fees for SKYY.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in MOO

0 total

Every MOO position is also held by SKYY.

Only in SKYY

0 total

Every SKYY position is also held by MOO.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.