ETF comparison
MOOvsROBO
Both Thematic.
VanEck Agribusiness ETF · Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF
Holdings overlap
1 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of MOO and ROBO would leave roughly1.2%of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — seewhat we don't scorefor why.
Cost difference
MOO is 39 bps cheaper than ROBO. On a $100,000 position that's about $390/yr more in fees for ROBO.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open thecost calculator pre-filled with MOO vs ROBO.
Top shared holdings
1 shared in total| # | Holding | In MOO | In ROBO | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deere & Co | 8.86% | 1.19% | 1.19% |
Only in MOO
46 total- Bayer AG9.26%
- Corteva Inc8.90%
- Nutrien Ltd6.15%
- Zoetis Inc5.19%
- Archer-Daniels-Midland Co5.05%
- Kubota Corp4.70%
- CF Industries Holdings Inc4.36%
- Tyson Foods Inc4.34%
- Bunge Global SA3.36%
- Mowi ASA2.73%
Only in ROBO
77 total- CELESTICA INC.2.22%
- AIRTAC INTERNATIONAL GROUP1.93%
- Koh Young Technology Inc1.85%
- TERADYNE, INC.1.84%
- Infineon Technologies AG1.84%
- HIWIN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION1.82%
- Harmonic Drive Systems Inc.1.79%
- FANUC CORPORATION1.77%
- AMBARELLA, INC.1.77%
- DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC.1.76%
Open MOO or ROBO at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodologyand funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.