ETF comparison

MOOvsXLK

Thematic vs Technology.

VanEck Agribusiness ETF · State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
0.0%

1 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of MOO and XLK would leave roughly0.0%of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

MOO only 101.3%Shared 0.0%XLK only 99.9%
In MOO only
46 positions
Shared
1 positions
In XLK only
74 positions

Side by side

MOO

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

VanEck · Thematic

51composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.56%
Net assets
$1.06B
TTM yield
2.07%
Top-10 conc.
60.2%
XLK

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

State Street · Technology

82composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.080%
Net assets
$121.44B
TTM yield
0.43%
Top-10 conc.
64.5%

Sub-score comparison

44
Cost
92
74
Tax efficiency
85
58
Liquidity
100
28
Concentration
22
Tracking quality
MOOsub-scoreXLK

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — seewhat we don't scorefor why.

Cost difference

XLK is 48 bps cheaper than MOO. On a $100,000 position that's about $480/yr more in fees for MOO.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open thecost calculator pre-filled with MOO vs XLK.

Top shared holdings

1 shared in total
#HoldingIn MOOIn XLKOverlap
1State Street Global Advisors1.32%0.00%0.00%

Only in MOO

46 total
  • Bayer AG9.26%
  • Corteva Inc8.90%
  • Deere & Co8.86%
  • Nutrien Ltd6.15%
  • Zoetis Inc5.19%
  • Archer-Daniels-Midland Co5.05%
  • Kubota Corp4.70%
  • CF Industries Holdings Inc4.36%
  • Tyson Foods Inc4.34%
  • Bunge Global SA3.36%

Only in XLK

74 total
  • NVIDIA Corp14.65%
  • Apple Inc12.85%
  • Microsoft Corp8.38%
  • Micron Technology Inc5.42%
  • Broadcom Inc5.41%
  • Advanced Micro Devices Inc5.28%
  • Intel Corp3.68%
  • Applied Materials Inc3.20%
  • Lam Research Corp3.02%
  • Cisco Systems Inc2.58%

Open MOO or XLK at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodologyand funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see/methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.