ETF comparison
MOO vs XLK
Thematic vs Technology.
VanEck Agribusiness ETF · State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Holdings overlap
1 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of MOO and XLK would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.
Cost difference
XLK is 48 bps cheaper than MOO. On a $100,000 position that's about $480/yr more in fees for MOO.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with MOO vs XLK.
Top shared holdings
1 shared in total| # | Holding | In MOO | In XLK | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Street Global Advisors | 1.89% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Only in MOO
47 total- Bayer AG 7.94%
- Deere & Co 7.55%
- Corteva Inc 6.89%
- Zoetis Inc 6.88%
- Nutrien Ltd 5.68%
- Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 5.62%
- CF Industries Holdings Inc 5.16%
- Tyson Foods Inc 4.80%
- Kubota Corp 3.94%
- Bunge Global SA 3.87%
Only in XLK
73 total- NVIDIA Corp 15.50%
- Apple Inc 13.63%
- Microsoft Corp 10.05%
- Broadcom Inc 5.37%
- Micron Technology Inc 3.39%
- Palantir Technologies Inc 2.98%
- Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.95%
- Cisco Systems Inc 2.73%
- Applied Materials Inc 2.42%
- Lam Research Corp 2.38%
Open MOO or XLK at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions
matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see
/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.