PlainIndex

ETF comparison

ARKQ vs MOO

Both Thematic.

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF · VanEck Agribusiness ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of ARKQ and MOO would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

ARKQ only 0.0% Shared 0.0% MOO only 0.0%
In ARKQ only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In MOO only
0 positions

Holdings data for ARKQ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for MOO covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

ARKQ

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF

ARK · Thematic

51 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.75%
Net assets
$2.11B
TTM yield
0.24%
Top-10 conc.
—
MOO

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

VanEck · Thematic

55 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.56%
Net assets
$1.16B
TTM yield
2.15%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

25
Cost
44
77
Tax efficiency
70
71
Liquidity
59
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
ARKQ sub-score MOO

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

MOO is 19 bps cheaper than ARKQ. On a $100,000 position that's about $190/yr more in fees for ARKQ.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in ARKQ

0 total

Every ARKQ position is also held by MOO.

Only in MOO

0 total

Every MOO position is also held by ARKQ.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.