ETF comparison

ARKQvsMOO

Both Thematic.

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF · VanEck Agribusiness ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
4.1%

1 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of ARKQ and MOO would leave roughly4.1%of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

ARKQ only 95.9%Shared 4.1%MOO only 97.2%
In ARKQ only
37 positions
Shared
1 positions
In MOO only
46 positions

Side by side

ARKQ

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF

ARK · Thematic

49composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.75%
Net assets
$1.92B
TTM yield
0.25%
Top-10 conc.
52.9%
MOO

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

VanEck · Thematic

51composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.56%
Net assets
$1.06B
TTM yield
2.07%
Top-10 conc.
60.2%

Sub-score comparison

25
Cost
44
77
Tax efficiency
74
69
Liquidity
58
39
Concentration
28
Tracking quality
ARKQsub-scoreMOO

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — seewhat we don't scorefor why.

Cost difference

MOO is 19 bps cheaper than ARKQ. On a $100,000 position that's about $190/yr more in fees for ARKQ.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open thecost calculator pre-filled with ARKQ vs MOO.

Top shared holdings

1 shared in total
#HoldingIn ARKQIn MOOOverlap
1DEERE & COMPANY4.10%8.86%4.10%

Only in ARKQ

37 total
  • TESLA INC9.86%
  • TERADYNE INC7.97%
  • ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC6.34%
  • KRATOS DEFENSE & SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC5.08%
  • ROCKET LAB CORP4.79%
  • ALPHABET INC4.63%
  • PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC3.81%
  • AMAZON.COM INC3.31%
  • TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD3.03%
  • AEROVIRONMENT INC2.94%

Only in MOO

46 total
  • Bayer AG9.26%
  • Corteva Inc8.90%
  • Nutrien Ltd6.15%
  • Zoetis Inc5.19%
  • Archer-Daniels-Midland Co5.05%
  • Kubota Corp4.70%
  • CF Industries Holdings Inc4.36%
  • Tyson Foods Inc4.34%
  • Bunge Global SA3.36%
  • Mowi ASA2.73%

Open ARKQ or MOO at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodologyand funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see/methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.