PlainIndex

ETF comparison

DBA vs DBC

Both Commodities.

Invesco DB Agriculture Fund · Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of DBA and DBC would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

DBA only 0.0% Shared 0.0% DBC only 0.0%
In DBA only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In DBC only
0 positions

Holdings data for DBA covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for DBC covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

DBA

Invesco DB Agriculture Fund

Invesco · Commodities

39 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.85%
Net assets
$1.25B
TTM yield
3.26%
Top-10 conc.
—
DBC

Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund

Invesco · Commodities

42 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.85%
Net assets
$1.89B
TTM yield
2.40%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

15
Cost
15
61
Tax efficiency
64
61
Liquidity
69
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
DBA sub-score DBC

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.85% vs 0.85%).

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in DBA

0 total

Every DBA position is also held by DBC.

Only in DBC

0 total

Every DBC position is also held by DBA.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.