ETF comparison

DBC vs IAU

Commodities vs Gold.

Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund · iShares Gold Trust

Holdings overlap

Holdings overlap isn't available for DBC or IAU.

Some fund types (grantor trusts, unit trusts) don't publish holdings in the standard monthly form we use. The side-by-side stats, sub-score comparison, and cost-difference panel below are still directly comparable.

Side by side

DBC

Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund

Invesco · Commodities

36 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.85%
Net assets
$1.58B
TTM yield
2.58%
Top-10 conc.
80.0%
IAU

iShares Gold Trust

iShares · Gold

80 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets
$60.14B
TTM yield
0.00%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

15
Cost
75
68
Tax efficiency
66
65
Liquidity
100
0
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
DBC sub-score IAU

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.

Cost difference

IAU is 60 bps cheaper than DBC. On a $100,000 position that's about $600/yr more in fees for DBC.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with DBC vs IAU.

Open DBC or IAU at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.